How do texts work to illuminate political issues?

Political texts mention problems which many people concern about, such as the education of women, the population of women. These texts are written to inform, illuminate, and persuade the readers to concern about the political issues.

The political texts are used to give the readers more information about some highlight problem, like the population of women. In “More than 100 Million Missing Women”, Amarty Sen wants to reflect the differences of the ratio of women to men in some places on the word. He gives two simple explanations, the East-Western culture and economic development to help his readers have more information and have a perfect view to the increase of women’s population. This is a political issue and the author wants people to know and can be comprehensive this problem.This is also the best way to illuminate political issue.

Many authors write the political texts to convince the readers to support this problem which is suggested, like the education of women. In “Women’s Capabilities and the Right to Education in Bangladesh”, Mary Arends-Kuenning and Sajeda Amin give the status of women’s education in village to convice their readers to support the education of women. The authors give a lot of benefits from education for women, such as having a good job, “make such a good marriage because of her education” (Arends and Amin, 130), reaching some social values than uneducated women, etc. The writers want citizen to support education for women to increase the educated level of women in community. By this way, the authors have an impact on people’s concern about political issues. When a lot of people are prone to talk about the political text, this problem will be prevalent in society and it is easy to become to illuminate the political text in community.

In short, to illuminate a political issue, a text should give some clear information as well as a lot of strong evidences, such as facts, numbers, and statistic. Thus, this text has enough data to make a belief to the readers. From that, the readers will tend to concern about the political text.

Works Cited
Amin and Arends. “Wome’s Capabilities and the Right to Education in Bangladesh”. Jstor.org. Springer. 1
Sen, Amartya. “More than 100 Million Missing Women”

Amartya Sen has the Strong Argument in the Eighth Paragraph.

Writer, Amartya Sen, in his essay, “More than 100 Million Missing Women”, recounts two reasons for the differences of the ratio of women to men in the Occident and the Orient. Two simplistic explanations are the East-Western culture and economic development. However, in the eighth paragraph, the author states that the East-Western culture diverges a flaw which cannot support the claim in the article as a whole: in Orient, the ratio of women to men is lower than this in Occident and Japan is strong evidence.

The content of the eighth paragraph is that the author gives evidence: the ratio of women to men in Japan is increasing for his readers to illustrate that using the East-Western culture to explain men are more than women is so superficial. In this paragraph, he means that people cannot support that in Asia, the population of women is always lower than the population of men. People cannot base on concept which “Western civilization is less sexist than Eastern” (Sen, 3) because this notion is so general and is not exact to some countries, like Japan.

In this paragraph, the author’s organization is well-ordered because after giving his topic sentence: “To take the cultural view first, the East-West explanation is obviously flawed because experiences within the East and Western diverge so sharply”, he gives evidence: Japan to support his claim. In Japan, by 1940, the population of women and men were not different. After 1940, the ratio of women and men is not similar because the population of women has been increasing. Therefore, in Japan the ratio of women to men is not the same with some countries in Asia. Thus, people cannot acknowledge that in Orient, the population of women is always lower than the population of men.

Many people can think that the author has a mistake when he shows this paragraph because it does not support his claim. However, when the author gives this paragraph, he does not want to rebut his claim in the whole of the essay; he really wants to make the readers have a perfect view to the differences of the ratio of women to men.

In short, in the eighth paragraph, the author makes his readers more clear about the East-Western explanation for the differences of the ratio of women to men when he gives a strong evidence: Japan.

The Structure of “More than 100 Million Missing Women” is Special

Writer, Amartya Sen, in his writing, “More than 100 Million Missing Women”, he describes the situation of women in the countries all over the word. To help his readers more understand and know about some differences between the ratio of women and men on the world, he bases chiefly on two explanations: the East-West explanation and economic development. The author structures his argument in this way has an advantage and a detriment.

The writer gives his readers a clear direction to understand his logic argument with two explanations of the ratio of women to men in some places in the world. Firstly, he begins his writing to explain why the population of women is larger than the population of men in the world with “Western civilization is less sexist than Eastern.” (3). Then, He continues to give the further reason for the high ration of women to men is that economic is developing. With this structure, the readers can follow easily his purpose in this writing. Moreover, the readers also focus on each section to know his motives. This is a simple structure, so the author makes the readers not feel bored when they read his writing.

However, he can make his readers doubt when he claims objectively that the ratio of women to men is high because of the East-West explanation. Many people can rebut his argument by some reasons, many countries in Asia do not have the high ratio of women to wen, China requires to have a child in family, so parents would like to have a male baby.The readers can refute like that because they need a firm conclusion for that claim.

With this structure, the author can make a smooth flow for his readers to understand his purpose, but it can make the audiences some doubts about some his claim in his writing.
Work Cited

Sen, Amartya.”More than 100 Million Missing Women”. 20 December 1990.

Timeline and Study

Each person has a differently educating way, such as take note, high light, etc. Besides, timeline is also a good way for everyone to study because it can help you save time and remember knowledge for a long time.

First of all, timeline is a choice of many people because it can help them save time. People just need some questions to create a perfect timeline, like what is the event? When did the event happen? Who related to the event? And what did the event describe? Before making a timeline, everyone should answer these questions. These requirements will not take a lot of their time. They not only save time making a timeline but also getting some information. The reason is that when people create a timeline with these above questions, your timeline will be very clear. Therefore, when everybody wants to review, they will get information quickly. Sometimes, they do not need to open their books. With time line, people can save more their time.

The further reason to use timeline in studying is that people can remember knowledge for a long time. Timeline is really useful for everyone when they learn World Civilization. Spending hours reading a lot of historic information can make people bored and cannot get information so much. However, when people have a timeline for themselves, they can get some crucial information, some main events and time perfectly. Timeline is the best way to shorten information makes information concise and be easy to remember them.

I hope that timeline will be a good way for everyone to study because it can help everyone to save time and remember knowledge for a long time.

In my point of view, Plato is not a feminist

To answer the question: “Is Plato a feminist?”, firstly, I want to show what a feminist is? According to Longman Exams Coach, “feminist is someone who supports the ideas that women should have the same rights and opportunities as men”. Thus, a feminist is a person who wants to bring equality to men and women in society. Go back to the topic: “Is Plato a feminist?” It is very difficult to conclude that Plato is a feminist because there are some evidences against him.
The first argument is that why in the events at Agathon’s house, there are only men, not women. I am confusing with that problem. If Plato were a feminist, certainty he would mention women in this event. The reason is that when women present in the events at Agathon’s house, that means they have opportunity to say what they think, what they argue. Therefore, they will have the same chance with men to share their speeches. However, Plato does not give them any opportunity. He just mentions Diotima through Socrates’s speech. Therefore, it is not enough to call Plato is a feminist.
The further argument is that in Phaedrus’ speech, Plato shows that he is not really a feminist through a sentence “no one will die for you but a lover and a lover will do this even if she’s a woman” (Symposium, 464). He uses “even if she’s a woman”. That means he has prejudice with women. Through this sentence, he wants to say that women are weak, not strong like men. In fact, he thinks like that, it is not easy for him to become a feminist because he has inequality between men and women.
From these above evidences, I think Plato is not a feminist. I do not know his thought whether or not support the rights and equality between men and women in society, but through his some show in Symposium, I cannot answer that he is a feminist because he does not convince me through he does not mention in the events at Agathon’s house and has prejudice with women in Phaedrus’s speech.

There Are Three Main Points in Phaedrus’s Speech

In Symposium, each person has a different definition about Love. Agathon says that: “Love is a great god and he belongs to beautiful things” (Symposium, 484). Diotima says that: “Love is neither good nor beautiful”, Love is not bad or ugly, “he could be something in between” (Symposium, 485), etc. And Phaedrus, he has a different definition about Love. In his speech, he has three main ideas to define Love. According to him, all of gods, Love is the most ancient, the most honored, and the most powerful (Symposium, 465).
Phaedrus thinks that Love is the most ancient because of some reasons. First of all, there is not any evidence to explain about the existence of Love’ parent in poetry or legend. As we know, poetry and legend appeared for a long time in history, but Love’ parent have “no place” (Symposium, 463) in that time. Therefore, Phaedrus concludes that Love is the most ancient god. To more support for his argument, he gives two more evidences of Hesiod and Parmenides. Their poetry confirm Phaedrus’s conclusion, make his speech more coherent.
The second main point is that Love is the most honored. Phaedrus says that if a man falls in love with his loved one, he will not let him leave ranks or drop weapons (Symposium, 464). Why does he act like that? Because he is in love, he does not want his loved one to see him coward. If he leave ranks or drop weapons, he will be shameful. In other words, he cannot save his loved one. However, in this case, Love helps him braver, inspire him with courage. Love really helps him become manly.
The last main one is that Love is the most powerful. To support for this point, he says that “no one will die for you but a lover and a lover will do this even if she’s a woman”. It is very difficult for people to die for another one. However, when you love another one so much, you can die for him. The reason you act like that because Love can inspire you power, even you are a woman. Many people think that woman is weak and soft; they daren’t die for her loved one. Yet, in Phaedrus’ speech, he uses Alcestis like an evidence to support his argument. She dares to die for her love one because she really loves his. This is the power of Love.
In Phaedrus’ argument, he has a logic organization and gives a lot of strong evidences to support his three main points about Love.

The Melody of “The Looking Glass”

          Kamla Das uses assonance in The Looking Glass to connect sensitive melodies and make them more subtle. With two last lines in the poem, the poet wrote:

                  “Body which once under his touch had gleamed

                  Like burnished brass, now drab and destitute.”

                             (Kamla Das)

         The poet uses assonance in the words “had”, “drab” to connect two lines. The sound in these words is the same. Assonance can be found in the words “his” and “destitute”, the sound “i” connects two lines.These assonances make up a tune for the poem. The melody of the poem is like the flow of the stream- smoothly, slowly, and steady.

         In The Looking Glass, readers may be struck by “getting a man to love is easy”. The poet means everyone can love anybody. Everyone has authority to notice, to remember or to admire another one. It is very easy, but after that, the author wrote: “but living without him afterward may have to be faced”. The author means it is very easy for everyone to love another one, but it is difficult to live with this one. Nothing more pain than that. When you and another person who you love cannot live together, that can make you lonely, lovesick, and cannot do anything. Your live might become boring and passive, but you only think about that person in your heart.