Amartya Sen has the Strong Argument in the Eighth Paragraph.

Writer, Amartya Sen, in his essay, “More than 100 Million Missing Women”, recounts two reasons for the differences of the ratio of women to men in the Occident and the Orient. Two simplistic explanations are the East-Western culture and economic development. However, in the eighth paragraph, the author states that the East-Western culture diverges a flaw which cannot support the claim in the article as a whole: in Orient, the ratio of women to men is lower than this in Occident and Japan is strong evidence.

The content of the eighth paragraph is that the author gives evidence: the ratio of women to men in Japan is increasing for his readers to illustrate that using the East-Western culture to explain men are more than women is so superficial. In this paragraph, he means that people cannot support that in Asia, the population of women is always lower than the population of men. People cannot base on concept which “Western civilization is less sexist than Eastern” (Sen, 3) because this notion is so general and is not exact to some countries, like Japan.

In this paragraph, the author’s organization is well-ordered because after giving his topic sentence: “To take the cultural view first, the East-West explanation is obviously flawed because experiences within the East and Western diverge so sharply”, he gives evidence: Japan to support his claim. In Japan, by 1940, the population of women and men were not different. After 1940, the ratio of women and men is not similar because the population of women has been increasing. Therefore, in Japan the ratio of women to men is not the same with some countries in Asia. Thus, people cannot acknowledge that in Orient, the population of women is always lower than the population of men.

Many people can think that the author has a mistake when he shows this paragraph because it does not support his claim. However, when the author gives this paragraph, he does not want to rebut his claim in the whole of the essay; he really wants to make the readers have a perfect view to the differences of the ratio of women to men.

In short, in the eighth paragraph, the author makes his readers more clear about the East-Western explanation for the differences of the ratio of women to men when he gives a strong evidence: Japan.

The Structure of “More than 100 Million Missing Women” is Special

Writer, Amartya Sen, in his writing, “More than 100 Million Missing Women”, he describes the situation of women in the countries all over the word. To help his readers more understand and know about some differences between the ratio of women and men on the world, he bases chiefly on two explanations: the East-West explanation and economic development. The author structures his argument in this way has an advantage and a detriment.

The writer gives his readers a clear direction to understand his logic argument with two explanations of the ratio of women to men in some places in the world. Firstly, he begins his writing to explain why the population of women is larger than the population of men in the world with “Western civilization is less sexist than Eastern.” (3). Then, He continues to give the further reason for the high ration of women to men is that economic is developing. With this structure, the readers can follow easily his purpose in this writing. Moreover, the readers also focus on each section to know his motives. This is a simple structure, so the author makes the readers not feel bored when they read his writing.

However, he can make his readers doubt when he claims objectively that the ratio of women to men is high because of the East-West explanation. Many people can rebut his argument by some reasons, many countries in Asia do not have the high ratio of women to wen, China requires to have a child in family, so parents would like to have a male baby.The readers can refute like that because they need a firm conclusion for that claim.

With this structure, the author can make a smooth flow for his readers to understand his purpose, but it can make the audiences some doubts about some his claim in his writing.
Work Cited

Sen, Amartya.”More than 100 Million Missing Women”. 20 December 1990.

Timeline and Study

Each person has a differently educating way, such as take note, high light, etc. Besides, timeline is also a good way for everyone to study because it can help you save time and remember knowledge for a long time.

First of all, timeline is a choice of many people because it can help them save time. People just need some questions to create a perfect timeline, like what is the event? When did the event happen? Who related to the event? And what did the event describe? Before making a timeline, everyone should answer these questions. These requirements will not take a lot of their time. They not only save time making a timeline but also getting some information. The reason is that when people create a timeline with these above questions, your timeline will be very clear. Therefore, when everybody wants to review, they will get information quickly. Sometimes, they do not need to open their books. With time line, people can save more their time.

The further reason to use timeline in studying is that people can remember knowledge for a long time. Timeline is really useful for everyone when they learn World Civilization. Spending hours reading a lot of historic information can make people bored and cannot get information so much. However, when people have a timeline for themselves, they can get some crucial information, some main events and time perfectly. Timeline is the best way to shorten information makes information concise and be easy to remember them.

I hope that timeline will be a good way for everyone to study because it can help everyone to save time and remember knowledge for a long time.