I’m not a good reader. When I have to read books or handouts in class, it takes me a lot of time to pay closely attention and re-read the text many times. Recently when we have study about political issues with large number of pages, I have to struggle to finish reading, understand and remember the content of the texts. However, I gain experience for myself that I find it less difficult and confusing as I read more and more political texts.
How to read political texts? Political issues are sensitive issues, so that the writers are required to present them with clear organization. In “Women’s Capabilities and the Right to Education in Bangladesh”, Arends-Kuenning and Amin divide the article into many sections with the abstract, introduction, 5 main points (Approach and Methodology, Women’s schooling and Marriage capital, The Effect of women’s education on Women’s well-being and agency, Education and Bargaining power, Women’s education and Traditional social structures) and the conclusion. Similarly, Lesorogol sets up her article with an abstract, introduction, 4 main points (Education and Modernity, Education and Boundary making, Boundaries of Knowledge and Capability, Boundaries of Gender roles and Morality/Sexuality) and conclusion. To save time but still get understanding thorough these articles, we had better read the abstract first. Then, we read the introduction section, skip the body sections and read the conclusion. While the introduction usually provides the background information as well as suggests what the writer is going to talk about, the conclusion summaries again the whole things; therefore, if we go over these sections first, we can have an observation over the issue and visualize what is going on in the text. We won’t get lost in the article. To read and understand the political issues better, we should print the texts. With the paper, we could mark and give our comments in the margin of the texts. In reading political issue, critical thinking will help us discern the points the writer argues for and decide whether or not we agree with the point.
To illuminate the political issues, the political texts are well-organized, precise and explicit but not metaphorical language with objective tone. The writer illustrates the issues with evidence: facts, statistics, and surveys, testimonials… For example, in “Women’s Capabilities and the Right to Education in Bangladesh”, the writers provide specific evidences from their interviews of the Bangladeshi rural residents to exemplify the writers’ claims about the Bangladeshi’s perception of education for women. In the same way, Lesorogol shows many facts and testimonials to prove the boundaries existing between educated girls and uneducated girls in Kenya. With evidences, the tone of the political issues is objective, free from bias. Thus, the writers gain credibility in their readers, convincing the readers.
Works Cited
Arends-Kuenning, Mary and Amin, Sanjeda, “Women’s capability and right to education in Bangladesh .” International Journal of Politics and Society, Vol. 15, No.1, September 2001. Print.
Carolyn, Lesorogol.K, “Setting Themselves Apart: Education, capabilities, and Sexuality among Samburu women in Kenya” International Journal of Politics and Society.Print.